There are always a lot of websites available that utilize the word "future" inside their domain name, but are they really futurist type websites? It is recommended often by print publishers and editors that the phrase "future" is a good word to use within titles, because it grabs people's attention. But, when people utilize the word future and then do not give predictions or future accounts, then are they really deceiving the viewer and web-surfer. I think they are.
Recently, an editor of the next of things type website asked me to create a column, in reviewing the internet site I came across it to be underwhelming on the futuristic aspect, and more heavy to the scientific news arena. Indeed, if the magazine is serious about "The Future" then why are typical the articles about new scientific innovations in today's period or happening at this time? - asked myself.
It appears like they are serious about scientific discovery that's already happened, not what'll maintain the future. That's just boring, more science news, regurgitation, typical human tactic of re-packaging information. I believe they could do better, but are holding themselves back, afraid to produce people think, worried you will get past an acceptable limit from your own mainstream, quote "core" band of viewers, which I think they cannot even understand.
Obviously, as an entrepreneur, I understand exactly why they take action this way. It is because they want to earn money and thus sink to a lowered amount of readership, while still pretending to speak about the future of stuff. Once the editor wished to defend such comments, the indication was that the site was mostly about scientific news.
Yes, I observe that the site is certainly caused by a news site and I ask what does that have related to the future of stuff? Shouldn't the internet site be called NSIN.com or something like this; for New Science Innovation News? If the site is approximately Science News and is an accumulation of everyone else's news, then it is a copy site of a type that's already used and not unique. Thus, the information is therefore the exact same, so even though the articles are written more clearly and easier to know, which can be nice, still what's the worthiness to a "science news junky" as there are hardly any articles on the website compared using their competition?
Should they called them selves a news site, then you might have "futurist type columnists" anyway, who might project these scientific news items into the near future or they might keep carefully the "Future Stuff" motif and promote the futurist columnists.
This will be a lesson to any or all "Futuristic" type websites as a case study. For the near future thinkers to your website and have nothing showing them, they will leave. If you utilize trickery to get regular readers there, you are doing a severe disservice to the future of mankind, by promoting present inventions while the be all end all. In any event, it's unethical to utilize this tactic on future of things type websites.